Journal cover Journal topic
SOIL An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  •  value: indexed indexed
  • CiteScore value: 5.79 CiteScore
    5.79
  • SNIP value: 2.052 SNIP 2.052
  • IPP value: 5.30 IPP 5.30
  • SJR value: 1.943 SJR 1.943
  • Scimago H <br class='hide-on-tablet hide-on-mobile'>index value: 21 Scimago H
    index 21
  • h5-index value: 22 h5-index 22
Volume 2, issue 2
SOIL, 2, 221–240, 2016
https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-2-221-2016
© Author(s) 2016. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Special issue: Soil as a record of the past

SOIL, 2, 221–240, 2016
https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-2-221-2016
© Author(s) 2016. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Original research article 07 Jun 2016

Original research article | 07 Jun 2016

Arctic soil development on a series of marine terraces on central Spitsbergen, Svalbard: a combined geochronology, fieldwork and modelling approach

W. Marijn van der Meij et al.
Download
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
Peer review completion
AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision
ED: Reconsider after minor revisions (review by Editor) (09 Apr 2016) by Marc Oliva
AR by Marijn van der Meij on behalf of the Authors (29 Apr 2016)  Author's response    Manuscript
ED: Reconsider after minor revisions (review by Editor) (03 May 2016) by Marc Oliva
AR by Marijn van der Meij on behalf of the Authors (04 May 2016)  Author's response    Manuscript
ED: Publish as is (06 May 2016) by Marc Oliva
ED: Publish subject to technical corrections (09 May 2016) by Eric C. Brevik(Executive Editor)
Publications Copernicus
Download
Short summary
This study combined fieldwork, geochronology and modelling to get a better understanding of Arctic soil development on a landscape scale. Main processes are aeolian deposition, physical and chemical weathering and silt translocation. Discrepancies between model results and field observations showed that soil and landscape development is not as straightforward as we hypothesized. Interactions between landscape processes and soil processes have resulted in a complex soil pattern in the landscape.
This study combined fieldwork, geochronology and modelling to get a better understanding of...
Citation