Articles | Volume 4, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-4-141-2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-4-141-2018
Original research article
 | 
05 Jun 2018
Original research article |  | 05 Jun 2018

Separation of soil respiration: a site-specific comparison of partition methods

Louis-Pierre Comeau, Derrick Y. F. Lai, Jane Jinglan Cui, and Jenny Farmer

Viewed

Total article views: 3,325 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
2,079 1,128 118 3,325 203 96 115
  • HTML: 2,079
  • PDF: 1,128
  • XML: 118
  • Total: 3,325
  • Supplement: 203
  • BibTeX: 96
  • EndNote: 115
Views and downloads (calculated since 16 Jan 2018)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 16 Jan 2018)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 3,325 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 2,940 with geography defined and 385 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 27 Mar 2024
Download
Short summary
To date, there are still many uncertainties and unknowns regarding the soil respiration partitioning procedures. This study compared the suitability and accuracy of five different respiration partitioning methods. A qualitative evaluation table of the partition methods with five performance parameters was produced. Overall, no systematically superior or inferior partition method was found and the combination of two or more methods optimizes assessment reliability.