Articles | Volume 6, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-6-145-2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-6-145-2020
Short communication
 | 
08 Apr 2020
Short communication |  | 08 Apr 2020

The 15N gas-flux method to determine N2 flux: a comparison of different tracer addition approaches

Dominika Lewicka-Szczebak and Reinhard Well

Related authors

Technical Note: TimeFRAME – A Bayesian Mixing Model to Unravel Isotopic Data and Quantify Trace Gas Production and Consumption Pathways for Timeseries Data
Eliza Jean Harris, Philipp Fischer, Maciej P. Lewicki, Dominika Lewicka-Szczebak, Stephen J. Harris, and Fernando Perez-Cruz
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2836,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2836, 2023
Short summary
Comparing modified substrate-induced respiration with selective inhibition (SIRIN) and N2O isotope approaches to estimate fungal contribution to denitrification in three arable soils under anoxic conditions
Lena Rohe, Traute-Heidi Anderson, Heinz Flessa, Anette Goeske, Dominika Lewicka-Szczebak, Nicole Wrage-Mönnig, and Reinhard Well
Biogeosciences, 18, 4629–4650, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-4629-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-4629-2021, 2021
Short summary
N2O isotope approaches for source partitioning of N2O production and estimation of N2O reduction – validation with the 15N gas-flux method in laboratory and field studies
Dominika Lewicka-Szczebak, Maciej Piotr Lewicki, and Reinhard Well
Biogeosciences, 17, 5513–5537, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-5513-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-5513-2020, 2020
Short summary
Underestimation of denitrification rates from field application of the 15N gas flux method and its correction by gas diffusion modelling
Reinhard Well, Martin Maier, Dominika Lewicka-Szczebak, Jan-Reent Köster, and Nicolas Ruoss
Biogeosciences, 16, 2233–2246, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-16-2233-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-16-2233-2019, 2019
Short summary
Early season N2O emissions under variable water management in rice systems: source-partitioning emissions using isotope ratios along a depth profile
Elizabeth Verhoeven, Matti Barthel, Longfei Yu, Luisella Celi, Daniel Said-Pullicino, Steven Sleutel, Dominika Lewicka-Szczebak, Johan Six, and Charlotte Decock
Biogeosciences, 16, 383–408, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-16-383-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-16-383-2019, 2019
Short summary

Related subject area

Soil and methods
Spatial prediction of organic carbon in German agricultural topsoil using machine learning algorithms
Ali Sakhaee, Anika Gebauer, Mareike Ließ, and Axel Don
SOIL, 8, 587–604, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-8-587-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-8-587-2022, 2022
Short summary
On the benefits of clustering approaches in digital soil mapping: an application example concerning soil texture regionalization
István Dunkl and Mareike Ließ
SOIL, 8, 541–558, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-8-541-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-8-541-2022, 2022
Short summary
An open Soil Structure Library based on X-ray CT data
Ulrich Weller, Lukas Albrecht, Steffen Schlüter, and Hans-Jörg Vogel
SOIL, 8, 507–515, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-8-507-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-8-507-2022, 2022
Short summary
Identification of thermal signature and quantification of charcoal in soil using differential scanning calorimetry and benzene polycarboxylic acid (BPCA) markers
Brieuc Hardy, Nils Borchard, and Jens Leifeld
SOIL, 8, 451–466, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-8-451-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-8-451-2022, 2022
Short summary
Estimating soil fungal abundance and diversity at a macroecological scale with deep learning spectrotransfer functions
Yuanyuan Yang, Zefang Shen, Andrew Bissett, and Raphael A. Viscarra Rossel
SOIL, 8, 223–235, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-8-223-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-8-223-2022, 2022
Short summary

Cited articles

Arah, J. R. M.: Apportioning nitrous oxide fluxes between nitrification and denitrification using gas-phase mass spectrometry, Soil Biol. Biochem., 29, 1295–1299, 1997. 
Aulakh, M. S., Doran, J. W., and Mosier, A. R.: Field-Evaluation of 4 Methods for Measuring Denitrification, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 55, 1332–1338, 1991. 
Baily, A., Watson, C. J., Laughlin, R., Matthews, D., McGeough, K., and Jordan, P.: Use of the 15N gas flux method to measure the source and level of N2O and N2 emissions from grazed grassland, Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosys., 94, 287–298, 2012. 
Bergsma, T. T., Ostrom, N. E., Emmons, M., and Robertson, G. P.: Measuring simultaneous fluxes from soil of N2O and N2 in the field using the 15N-Gas “nonequilihrium” technique, Environ. Sci. Technol., 35, 4307–4312, 2001. 
Buchen, C., Lewicka-Szczebak, D., Fuß, R., Helfrich, M., Flessa, H., and Well, R.: Fluxes of N2 and N2O and contributing processes in summer after grassland renewal and grassland conversion to maize cropping on a Plaggic Anthrosol and a Histic Gleysol, Soil Biol. Biochem., 101, 6–19, 2016. 
Download
Short summary
This study aimed at comparison of various experimental strategies for incubating soil samples to determine the N2 flux. Such experiments require addition of isotope tracer, i.e. nitrogen fertilizer enriched in heavy nitrogen isotopes (15N). Here we compared the impact of soil homogenization and mixing with the tracer and tracer injection to the intact soil cores. The results are well comparable: both techniques would provide similar conclusions on the magnitude of N2 flux.