Articles | Volume 4, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-4-101-2018
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-4-101-2018
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Review article
| 
15 May 2018
Review article |
| 15 May 2018
| 15 May 2018
Proximal sensing for soil carbon accounting
Jacqueline R. England
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
CSIRO Land and Water, Private Bag 10, Clayton South, VIC 3169, Australia
Raphael A. Viscarra Rossel
CSIRO Land and Water, Bruce E. Butler Laboratory, P.O. Box 1700, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia
Related authors
No articles found.
Lingfei Wang, Gab Abramowitz, Ying-Ping Wang, Andy Pitman, and Raphael Viscarra Rossel
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-3016, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-3016, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Effective managements of soil organic carbon require accurate knowledge of its existing distribution and influential factors of carbon dynamics. We identify the importance of variables on carbon variation and estimate SOC stocks in Australia using various models. We find there are significant disparities in SOC estimates when different models are used, highlighting the need for a critical re-evaluation of land management strategies that rely on SOC distribution derived from a single approach.
Lewis Walden, Farid Sepanta, and Raphael Viscarra Rossel
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2464, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2464, 2023
Preprint archived
Short summary
Short summary
We characterised the chemical and mineral composition of soil organic carbon fractions with mid-infrared spectroscopy. We identified unique and shared features of the spectra of carbon fractions, and the interactions between their organic and mineral components. These interactions are key to the persistence of C in soils, and we propose that mid-infrared spectroscopy could help to infer stability of soil C.
Zefang Shen, Haylee D'Agui, Lewis Walden, Mingxi Zhang, Tsoek Man Yiu, Kingsley Dixon, Paul Nevill, Adam Cross, Mohana Matangulu, Yang Hu, and Raphael A. Viscarra Rossel
SOIL, 8, 467–486, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-8-467-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-8-467-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We compared miniaturised visible and near-infrared spectrometers to a portable visible–near-infrared instrument, which is more expensive. Statistical and machine learning algorithms were used to model 29 key soil health indicators. Accuracy of the miniaturised spectrometers was comparable to the portable system. Soil spectroscopy with these tiny sensors is cost-effective and could diagnose soil health, help monitor soil rehabilitation, and deliver positive environmental and economic outcomes.
Yuanyuan Yang, Zefang Shen, Andrew Bissett, and Raphael A. Viscarra Rossel
SOIL, 8, 223–235, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-8-223-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-8-223-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We present a new method to estimate the relative abundance of the dominant phyla and diversity of fungi in Australian soil. It uses state-of-the-art machine learning with publicly available data on soil and environmental proxies for edaphic, climatic, biotic and topographic factors, and visible–near infrared wavelengths. The estimates could serve to supplement the more expensive molecular approaches towards a better understanding of soil fungal abundance and diversity in agronomy and ecology.
Juhwan Lee, Raphael A. Viscarra Rossel, Mingxi Zhang, Zhongkui Luo, and Ying-Ping Wang
Biogeosciences, 18, 5185–5202, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-5185-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-5185-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
We performed Roth C simulations across Australia and assessed the response of soil carbon to changing inputs and future climate change using a consistent modelling framework. Site-specific initialisation of the C pools with measurements of the C fractions is essential for accurate simulations of soil organic C stocks and composition at a large scale. With further warming, Australian soils will become more vulnerable to C loss: natural environments > native grazing > cropping > modified grazing.
Philipp Baumann, Anatol Helfenstein, Andreas Gubler, Armin Keller, Reto Giulio Meuli, Daniel Wächter, Juhwan Lee, Raphael Viscarra Rossel, and Johan Six
SOIL, 7, 525–546, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-7-525-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-7-525-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
We developed the Swiss mid-infrared spectral library and a statistical model collection across 4374 soil samples with reference measurements of 16 properties. Our library incorporates soil from 1094 grid locations and 71 long-term monitoring sites. This work confirms once again that nationwide spectral libraries with diverse soils can reliably feed information to a fast chemical diagnosis. Our data-driven reduction of the library has the potential to accurately monitor carbon at the plot scale.
Anatol Helfenstein, Philipp Baumann, Raphael Viscarra Rossel, Andreas Gubler, Stefan Oechslin, and Johan Six
SOIL, 7, 193–215, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-7-193-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-7-193-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
In this study, we show that a soil spectral library (SSL) can be used to predict soil carbon at new and very different locations. The importance of this finding is that it requires less time-consuming lab work than calibrating a new model for every local application, while still remaining similar to or more accurate than local models. Furthermore, we show that this method even works for predicting (drained) peat soils, using a SSL with mostly mineral soils containing much less soil carbon.
Zhongkui Luo, Raphael A. Viscarra-Rossel, and Tian Qian
Biogeosciences, 18, 2063–2073, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-2063-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-2063-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Using the data from 141 584 whole-soil profiles across the globe, we disentangled the relative importance of biotic, climatic and edaphic variables in controlling global SOC stocks. The results suggested that soil properties and climate contributed similarly to the explained global variance of SOC in four sequential soil layers down to 2 m. However, the most important individual controls are consistently soil-related, challenging current climate-driven framework of SOC dynamics.
Andre Carnieletto Dotto, Jose A. M. Demattê, Raphael A. Viscarra Rossel, and Rodnei Rizzo
SOIL, 6, 163–177, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-6-163-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-6-163-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
The objective of this study was to develop a soil grouping system based on spectral, climate, and terrain variables with the aim of developing a quantitative way to classify soils. To derive the new system, we applied the above-mentioned variables using cluster analysis and defined eight groups or "soil environment groupings" (SEGs). The SEG system facilitated the identification of groups with similar characteristics using not only soil but also environmental variables for their distinction.
Juhwan Lee, Gina M. Garland, and Raphael A. Viscarra Rossel
SOIL, 4, 213–224, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-4-213-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-4-213-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
Soil nitrogen (N) is an essential element for plant growth, but its plant-available forms are subject to loss from the environment by leaching and gaseous emissions. Still, factors controlling soil mineral N concentrations at large spatial scales are not well understood. We determined and discussed primary soil controls over the concentrations of NH4+ and NO3− at the continental scale of Australia while considering specific dominant land use patterns on a regional basis.
V. Haverd, M. R. Raupach, P. R. Briggs, J. G. Canadell, P. Isaac, C. Pickett-Heaps, S. H. Roxburgh, E. van Gorsel, R. A. Viscarra Rossel, and Z. Wang
Biogeosciences, 10, 2011–2040, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-2011-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-2011-2013, 2013
Related subject area
Soil and methods
Spatial prediction of organic carbon in German agricultural topsoil using machine learning algorithms
On the benefits of clustering approaches in digital soil mapping: an application example concerning soil texture regionalization
An open Soil Structure Library based on X-ray CT data
Identification of thermal signature and quantification of charcoal in soil using differential scanning calorimetry and benzene polycarboxylic acid (BPCA) markers
Estimating soil fungal abundance and diversity at a macroecological scale with deep learning spectrotransfer functions
An underground, wireless, open-source, low-cost system for monitoring oxygen, temperature, and soil moisture
Estimation of soil properties with mid-infrared soil spectroscopy across yam production landscapes in West Africa
The central African soil spectral library: a new soil infrared repository and a geographical prediction analysis
Developing the Swiss mid-infrared soil spectral library for local estimation and monitoring
Predicting the spatial distribution of soil organic carbon stock in Swedish forests using a group of covariates and site-specific data
Improved calibration of the Green–Ampt infiltration module in the EROSION-2D/3D model using a rainfall-runoff experiment database
Quantifying soil carbon in temperate peatlands using a mid-IR soil spectral library
Are researchers following best storage practices for measuring soil biochemical properties?
Quantifying and correcting for pre-assay CO2 loss in short-term carbon mineralization assays
The influence of training sample size on the accuracy of deep learning models for the prediction of soil properties with near-infrared spectroscopy data
Game theory interpretation of digital soil mapping convolutional neural networks
Comparing three approaches of spatial disaggregation of legacy soil maps based on the Disaggregation and Harmonisation of Soil Map Units Through Resampled Classification Trees (DSMART) algorithm
Oblique geographic coordinates as covariates for digital soil mapping
Development of pedotransfer functions for water retention in tropical mountain soil landscapes: spotlight on parameter tuning in machine learning
The 15N gas-flux method to determine N2 flux: a comparison of different tracer addition approaches
A new model for intra- and inter-institutional soil data sharing
Machine learning and soil sciences: a review aided by machine learning tools
Identification of new microbial functional standards for soil quality assessment
Identifying and quantifying geogenic organic carbon in soils – the case of graphite
Error propagation in spectrometric functions of soil organic carbon
Word embeddings for application in geosciences: development, evaluation, and examples of soil-related concepts
Soil lacquer peel do-it-yourself: simply capturing beauty
Multi-source data integration for soil mapping using deep learning
Using deep learning for digital soil mapping
No silver bullet for digital soil mapping: country-specific soil organic carbon estimates across Latin America
Separation of soil respiration: a site-specific comparison of partition methods
Evaluation of digital soil mapping approaches with large sets of environmental covariates
Planning spatial sampling of the soil from an uncertain reconnaissance variogram
Mapping of soil properties at high resolution in Switzerland using boosted geoadditive models
Quantitative imaging of the 3-D distribution of cation adsorption sites in undisturbed soil
Decision support for the selection of reference sites using 137Cs as a soil erosion tracer
Soil organic carbon stocks are systematically overestimated by misuse of the parameters bulk density and rock fragment content
The added value of biomarker analysis to the genesis of plaggic Anthrosols; the identification of stable fillings used for the production of plaggic manure
Synchrotron microtomographic quantification of geometrical soil pore characteristics affected by compaction
Pedotransfer functions for Irish soils – estimation of bulk density (ρb) per horizon type
Assessing the performance of a plastic optical fibre turbidity sensor for measuring post-fire erosion from plot to catchment scale
Passive soil heating using an inexpensive infrared mirror design – a proof of concept
The application of terrestrial laser scanner and SfM photogrammetry in measuring erosion and deposition processes in two opposite slopes in a humid badlands area (central Spanish Pyrenees)
Soil surface roughness: comparing old and new measuring methods and application in a soil erosion model
Comparison of spatial association approaches for landscape mapping of soil organic carbon stocks
Eddy covariance for quantifying trace gas fluxes from soils
Ali Sakhaee, Anika Gebauer, Mareike Ließ, and Axel Don
SOIL, 8, 587–604, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-8-587-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-8-587-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
As soil carbon has become a key component of climate-smart agriculture, the demand for high-resolution maps has increased drastically. Meanwhile, machine learning algorithms are becoming more widely used and are opening up new solutions in soil mapping. This paper shows which algorithms perform best, how soil inventory data can be most efficiently used for digital soil mapping, and the different available options and methods to derive high-resolution soil carbon data at the large regional scale.
István Dunkl and Mareike Ließ
SOIL, 8, 541–558, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-8-541-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-8-541-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Digital soil mapping (DSM) allows us to regionalize soil properties by relating them to environmental covariates with the help of an empirical model. Legacy soil data provide a valuable basis to generate high-resolution soil maps with DSM. We studied the usefulness of data-clustering methods to tackle potential sampling bias in legacy soil data while applying DSM for soil texture regionalization. Clustering has proved to be useful in various steps of the DSM process.
Ulrich Weller, Lukas Albrecht, Steffen Schlüter, and Hans-Jörg Vogel
SOIL, 8, 507–515, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-8-507-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-8-507-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Soil structure is of central importance for soil functions. It is, however, ill defined. With the increasing availability of X-ray CT scanners, more and more soils are scanned and an undisturbed image of the soil's structure is produced. Often, a qualitative description is all that is derived from these images. We provide now a web-based Soil Structure Library where these images can be evaluated in a standardized quantitative way and can be compared to a world-wide data set.
Brieuc Hardy, Nils Borchard, and Jens Leifeld
SOIL, 8, 451–466, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-8-451-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-8-451-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Soil amendment with artificial black carbon (BC; biomass transformed by incomplete combustion) has the potential to mitigate climate change. Nevertheless, the accurate quantification of BC in soil remains a critical issue. Here, we successfully used dynamic thermal analysis (DTA) to quantify centennial BC in soil. We demonstrate that DTA is largely under-exploited despite providing rapid and low-cost quantitative information over the range of soil organic matter.
Yuanyuan Yang, Zefang Shen, Andrew Bissett, and Raphael A. Viscarra Rossel
SOIL, 8, 223–235, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-8-223-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-8-223-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We present a new method to estimate the relative abundance of the dominant phyla and diversity of fungi in Australian soil. It uses state-of-the-art machine learning with publicly available data on soil and environmental proxies for edaphic, climatic, biotic and topographic factors, and visible–near infrared wavelengths. The estimates could serve to supplement the more expensive molecular approaches towards a better understanding of soil fungal abundance and diversity in agronomy and ecology.
Elad Levintal, Yonatan Ganot, Gail Taylor, Peter Freer-Smith, Kosana Suvocarev, and Helen E. Dahlke
SOIL, 8, 85–97, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-8-85-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-8-85-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Do-it-yourself hardware is a new approach for improving measurement resolution in research. Here we present a new low-cost, wireless underground sensor network for soil monitoring. All data logging, power, and communication component cost is USD 150, much cheaper than other available commercial solutions. We provide the complete building guide to reduce any technical barriers, which we hope will allow easier reproducibility and open new environmental monitoring applications.
Philipp Baumann, Juhwan Lee, Emmanuel Frossard, Laurie Paule Schönholzer, Lucien Diby, Valérie Kouamé Hgaza, Delwende Innocent Kiba, Andrew Sila, Keith Sheperd, and Johan Six
SOIL, 7, 717–731, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-7-717-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-7-717-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
This work delivers openly accessible and validated calibrations for diagnosing 26 soil properties based on mid-infrared spectroscopy. These were developed for four regions in Burkina Faso and Côte d'Ivoire, including 80 fields of smallholder farmers. The models can help to site-specifically and cost-efficiently monitor soil quality and fertility constraints to ameliorate soils and yields of yam or other staple crops in the four regions between the humid forest and the northern Guinean savanna.
Laura Summerauer, Philipp Baumann, Leonardo Ramirez-Lopez, Matti Barthel, Marijn Bauters, Benjamin Bukombe, Mario Reichenbach, Pascal Boeckx, Elizabeth Kearsley, Kristof Van Oost, Bernard Vanlauwe, Dieudonné Chiragaga, Aimé Bisimwa Heri-Kazi, Pieter Moonen, Andrew Sila, Keith Shepherd, Basile Bazirake Mujinya, Eric Van Ranst, Geert Baert, Sebastian Doetterl, and Johan Six
SOIL, 7, 693–715, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-7-693-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-7-693-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
We present a soil mid-infrared library with over 1800 samples from central Africa in order to facilitate soil analyses of this highly understudied yet critical area. Together with an existing continental library, we demonstrate a regional analysis and geographical extrapolation to predict total carbon and nitrogen. Our results show accurate predictions and highlight the value that the data contribute to existing libraries. Our library is openly available for public use and for expansion.
Philipp Baumann, Anatol Helfenstein, Andreas Gubler, Armin Keller, Reto Giulio Meuli, Daniel Wächter, Juhwan Lee, Raphael Viscarra Rossel, and Johan Six
SOIL, 7, 525–546, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-7-525-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-7-525-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
We developed the Swiss mid-infrared spectral library and a statistical model collection across 4374 soil samples with reference measurements of 16 properties. Our library incorporates soil from 1094 grid locations and 71 long-term monitoring sites. This work confirms once again that nationwide spectral libraries with diverse soils can reliably feed information to a fast chemical diagnosis. Our data-driven reduction of the library has the potential to accurately monitor carbon at the plot scale.
Kpade O. L. Hounkpatin, Johan Stendahl, Mattias Lundblad, and Erik Karltun
SOIL, 7, 377–398, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-7-377-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-7-377-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Forests store large amounts of carbon in soils. Implementing suitable measures to improve the sink potential of forest soils would require accurate data on the carbon stored in forest soils and a better understanding of the factors affecting this storage. This study showed that the prediction of soil carbon stock in Swedish forest soils can increase in accuracy when one divides a big region into smaller areas in combination with information collected locally and derived from satellites.
Hana Beitlerová, Jonas Lenz, Jan Devátý, Martin Mistr, Jiří Kapička, Arno Buchholz, Ilona Gerndtová, and Anne Routschek
SOIL, 7, 241–253, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-7-241-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-7-241-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
This study presents transfer functions for a calibration parameter of the Green–Ampt infiltration module of the EROSION-2D/3D model, which are significantly improving the model performance compared to the current state. The relationships found between calibration parameters and soil parameters however put the Green–Ampt implementation in the model and the state-of-the-art parametrization method in question. A new direction of the infiltration module development is proposed.
Anatol Helfenstein, Philipp Baumann, Raphael Viscarra Rossel, Andreas Gubler, Stefan Oechslin, and Johan Six
SOIL, 7, 193–215, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-7-193-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-7-193-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
In this study, we show that a soil spectral library (SSL) can be used to predict soil carbon at new and very different locations. The importance of this finding is that it requires less time-consuming lab work than calibrating a new model for every local application, while still remaining similar to or more accurate than local models. Furthermore, we show that this method even works for predicting (drained) peat soils, using a SSL with mostly mineral soils containing much less soil carbon.
Jennifer M. Rhymes, Irene Cordero, Mathilde Chomel, Jocelyn M. Lavallee, Angela L. Straathof, Deborah Ashworth, Holly Langridge, Marina Semchenko, Franciska T. de Vries, David Johnson, and Richard D. Bardgett
SOIL, 7, 95–106, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-7-95-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-7-95-2021, 2021
Matthew A. Belanger, Carmella Vizza, G. Philip Robertson, and Sarah S. Roley
SOIL, 7, 47–52, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-7-47-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-7-47-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Soil health is often assessed by re-wetting a dry soil and measuring CO2 production, but the potential bias introduced by soils of different moisture contents is unclear. Our study found that wetter soil tended to lose more carbon during drying than drier soil, thus affecting soil health interpretations. We developed a correction factor to account for initial soil moisture effects, which future studies may benefit from adapting for their soil.
Wartini Ng, Budiman Minasny, Wanderson de Sousa Mendes, and José Alexandre Melo Demattê
SOIL, 6, 565–578, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-6-565-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-6-565-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
The number of samples utilised to create predictive models affected model performance. This research compares the number of samples needed by a deep learning model to outperform the traditional machine learning models using visible near-infrared spectroscopy data for soil properties predictions. The deep learning model was found to outperform machine learning models when the sample size was above 2000.
José Padarian, Alex B. McBratney, and Budiman Minasny
SOIL, 6, 389–397, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-6-389-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-6-389-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
In this paper we introduce the use of game theory to interpret a digital soil mapping (DSM) model to understand the contribution of environmental factors to the prediction of soil organic carbon (SOC) in Chile. The analysis corroborated that the SOC model is capturing sensible relationships between SOC and climatic and topographical factors. We were able to represent them spatially (map) addressing the limitations of the current interpretation of models in DSM.
Yosra Ellili-Bargaoui, Brendan Philip Malone, Didier Michot, Budiman Minasny, Sébastien Vincent, Christian Walter, and Blandine Lemercier
SOIL, 6, 371–388, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-6-371-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-6-371-2020, 2020
Anders Bjørn Møller, Amélie Marie Beucher, Nastaran Pouladi, and Mogens Humlekrog Greve
SOIL, 6, 269–289, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-6-269-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-6-269-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Decision trees have become a widely adapted tool for mapping soil properties in geographic space. However, it is problematic to implement spatial relationships in the models. We present a new method which uses geographic coordinates along several axes tilted at oblique angles in the models. We test this method on four spatial datasets. The results show that the new method is at least as accurate as other proposed alternatives, has a computational advantage and is flexible and interpretable.
Anika Gebauer, Monja Ellinger, Victor M. Brito Gomez, and Mareike Ließ
SOIL, 6, 215–229, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-6-215-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-6-215-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Pedotransfer functions (PTFs) for soil water retention were developed for two tropical soil landscapes using machine learning. The models corresponding to these PTFs had to be adjusted by tuning their parameters. The standard tuning approach was compared to mathematical optimization. The latter resulted in much better model performance. The PTFs derived are of particular importance for soil process and hydrological models.
Dominika Lewicka-Szczebak and Reinhard Well
SOIL, 6, 145–152, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-6-145-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-6-145-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
This study aimed at comparison of various experimental strategies for incubating soil samples to determine the N2 flux. Such experiments require addition of isotope tracer, i.e. nitrogen fertilizer enriched in heavy nitrogen isotopes (15N). Here we compared the impact of soil homogenization and mixing with the tracer and tracer injection to the intact soil cores. The results are well comparable: both techniques would provide similar conclusions on the magnitude of N2 flux.
José Padarian and Alex B. McBratney
SOIL, 6, 89–94, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-6-89-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-6-89-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Data sharing and collaboration are critical to solving large-scale problems. The prevailing soil data-sharing model is of a centralized nature and, consequently, results in the participants ceding control and governance over their data to the lead party. Here we explore the use of a distributed ledger (blockchain) to solve the aforementioned issues. We also describe the potential use case of developing a global soil spectral library between multiple, international institutions.
José Padarian, Budiman Minasny, and Alex B. McBratney
SOIL, 6, 35–52, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-6-35-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-6-35-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
The application of machine learning (ML) has shown an accelerated adoption in soil sciences. It is a difficult task to manually review all papers on the application of ML. This paper aims to provide a review of the application of ML aided by topic modelling in order to find patterns in a large collection of publications. The objective is to gain insight into the applications and to discuss research gaps. We found 12 main topics and that ML methods usually perform better than traditional ones.
Sören Thiele-Bruhn, Michael Schloter, Berndt-Michael Wilke, Lee A. Beaudette, Fabrice Martin-Laurent, Nathalie Cheviron, Christian Mougin, and Jörg Römbke
SOIL, 6, 17–34, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-6-17-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-6-17-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Soil quality depends on the functioning of soil microbiota. Only a few standardized methods are available to assess this as well as adverse effects of human activities. So we need to identify promising additional methods that target soil microbial function. Discussed are (i) molecular methods using qPCR for new endpoints, e.g. in N and P cycling and greenhouse gas emissions, (ii) techniques for fungal enzyme activities, and (iii) field methods on carbon turnover such as the litter bag test.
Jeroen H. T. Zethof, Martin Leue, Cordula Vogel, Shane W. Stoner, and Karsten Kalbitz
SOIL, 5, 383–398, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-5-383-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-5-383-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
A widely overlooked source of carbon (C) in the soil environment is organic C of geogenic origin, e.g. graphite. Appropriate methods are not available to quantify graphite and to differentiate it from other organic and inorganic C sources in soils. Therefore, we examined Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, thermogravimetric analysis and the smart combustion method for their ability to identify and quantify graphitic C in soils. The smart combustion method showed the most promising results.
Monja Ellinger, Ines Merbach, Ulrike Werban, and Mareike Ließ
SOIL, 5, 275–288, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-5-275-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-5-275-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
Vis–NIR spectrometry is often applied to capture soil organic carbon (SOC). This study addresses the impact of the involved data and modelling aspects on SOC precision with a focus on the propagation of input data uncertainties. It emphasizes the necessity of transparent documentation of the measurement protocol and the model building and validation procedure. Particularly, when Vis–NIR spectrometry is used for soil monitoring, the aspect of uncertainty propagation becomes essential.
José Padarian and Ignacio Fuentes
SOIL, 5, 177–187, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-5-177-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-5-177-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
A large amount of descriptive information is available in geosciences. Considering the advances in natural language it is possible to
rescuethis information and transform it into a numerical form (embeddings). We used 280764 full-text scientific articles to train a language model capable of generating such embeddings. Our domain-specific embeddings (GeoVec) outperformed general domain embedding tasks such as analogies, relatedness, and categorisation, and can be used in novel applications.
Cathelijne R. Stoof, Jasper H. J. Candel, Laszlo A. G. M. van der Wal, and Gert Peek
SOIL, 5, 159–175, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-5-159-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-5-159-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
Teaching and outreach of soils is often done with real-life snapshots of soils and sediments in lacquer or glue peels. While it may seem hard, anyone can make such a peel. Illustrated with handmade drawings and an instructional video, we explain how to capture soils in peels using readily available materials. A new twist to old methods makes this safer, simpler, and more successful, and thus a true DIY (do-it-yourself) activity, highlighting the value and beauty of the ground below our feet.
Alexandre M. J.-C. Wadoux, José Padarian, and Budiman Minasny
SOIL, 5, 107–119, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-5-107-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-5-107-2019, 2019
José Padarian, Budiman Minasny, and Alex B. McBratney
SOIL, 5, 79–89, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-5-79-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-5-79-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
Digital soil mapping has been widely used as a cost-effective method for generating soil maps. DSM models are usually calibrated using point observations and rarely incorporate contextual information of the landscape. Here, we use convolutional neural networks to incorporate spatial context. We used as input a 3-D stack of covariate images to simultaneously predict organic carbon content at multiple depths. In this study, our model reduced the error by 30 % compared with conventional techniques.
Mario Guevara, Guillermo Federico Olmedo, Emma Stell, Yusuf Yigini, Yameli Aguilar Duarte, Carlos Arellano Hernández, Gloria E. Arévalo, Carlos Eduardo Arroyo-Cruz, Adriana Bolivar, Sally Bunning, Nelson Bustamante Cañas, Carlos Omar Cruz-Gaistardo, Fabian Davila, Martin Dell Acqua, Arnulfo Encina, Hernán Figueredo Tacona, Fernando Fontes, José Antonio Hernández Herrera, Alejandro Roberto Ibelles Navarro, Veronica Loayza, Alexandra M. Manueles, Fernando Mendoza Jara, Carolina Olivera, Rodrigo Osorio Hermosilla, Gonzalo Pereira, Pablo Prieto, Iván Alexis Ramos, Juan Carlos Rey Brina, Rafael Rivera, Javier Rodríguez-Rodríguez, Ronald Roopnarine, Albán Rosales Ibarra, Kenset Amaury Rosales Riveiro, Guillermo Andrés Schulz, Adrian Spence, Gustavo M. Vasques, Ronald R. Vargas, and Rodrigo Vargas
SOIL, 4, 173–193, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-4-173-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-4-173-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
We provide a reproducible multi-modeling approach for SOC mapping across Latin America on a country-specific basis as required by the Global Soil Partnership of the United Nations. We identify key prediction factors for SOC across each country. We compare and test different methods to generate spatially explicit predictions of SOC and conclude that there is no best method on a quantifiable basis.
Louis-Pierre Comeau, Derrick Y. F. Lai, Jane Jinglan Cui, and Jenny Farmer
SOIL, 4, 141–152, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-4-141-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-4-141-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
To date, there are still many uncertainties and unknowns regarding the soil respiration partitioning procedures. This study compared the suitability and accuracy of five different respiration partitioning methods. A qualitative evaluation table of the partition methods with five performance parameters was produced. Overall, no systematically superior or inferior partition method was found and the combination of two or more methods optimizes assessment reliability.
Madlene Nussbaum, Kay Spiess, Andri Baltensweiler, Urs Grob, Armin Keller, Lucie Greiner, Michael E. Schaepman, and Andreas Papritz
SOIL, 4, 1–22, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-4-1-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-4-1-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
This paper presents an extensive evaluation of digital soil mapping (DSM) tools. Recently, large sets of environmental covariates (e.g. from analysis of terrain on multiple scales) have become more common for DSM. Many DSM studies, however, only compared DSM methods using less than 30 covariates or tested approaches on few responses. We built DSM models from 300–500 covariates using six approaches that are either popular in DSM or promising for large covariate sets.
R. Murray Lark, Elliott M. Hamilton, Belinda Kaninga, Kakoma K. Maseka, Moola Mutondo, Godfrey M. Sakala, and Michael J. Watts
SOIL, 3, 235–244, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-3-235-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-3-235-2017, 2017
Short summary
Short summary
An advantage of geostatistics for mapping soil properties is that, given a statistical model of the variable of interest, we can make a rational decision about how densely to sample so that the map is sufficiently precise. However, uncertainty about the statistical model affects this process. In this paper we show how Bayesian methods can be used to support decision making on sampling with an uncertain model, ensuring that the probability of meeting certain levels of precision is high enough.
Madlene Nussbaum, Lorenz Walthert, Marielle Fraefel, Lucie Greiner, and Andreas Papritz
SOIL, 3, 191–210, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-3-191-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-3-191-2017, 2017
Short summary
Short summary
Digital soil mapping (DSM) relates soil property data to environmental data that describe soil-forming factors. With imagery sampled from satellites or terrain analysed at multiple scales, large sets of possible input to DSM are available. We propose a new statistical framework (geoGAM) that selects parsimonious models for DSM and illustrate the application of geoGAM to two study regions. Straightforward interpretation of the modelled effects likely improves end-user acceptance of DSM products.
Hannes Keck, Bjarne W. Strobel, Jon Petter Gustafsson, and John Koestel
SOIL, 3, 177–189, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-3-177-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-3-177-2017, 2017
Short summary
Short summary
Several studies have shown that the cation adsorption sites in soils are heterogeneously distributed in space. In many soil system models this knowledge is not included yet. In our study we proposed a new method to map the 3-D distribution of cation adsorption sites in undisturbed soils. The method is based on three-dimensional X-ray scanning with a contrast agent and image analysis. We are convinced that this approach will strongly aid the development of more realistic soil system models.
Laura Arata, Katrin Meusburger, Alexandra Bürge, Markus Zehringer, Michael E. Ketterer, Lionel Mabit, and Christine Alewell
SOIL, 3, 113–122, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-3-113-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-3-113-2017, 2017
Christopher Poeplau, Cora Vos, and Axel Don
SOIL, 3, 61–66, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-3-61-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-3-61-2017, 2017
Short summary
Short summary
This paper shows that three out of four frequently used methods to calculate soil organic carbon stocks lead to systematic overestimation of those stocks. Stones, which can be assumed to be free of carbon, have to be corrected for in both bulk density and layer thickness. We used data of the German Agricultural Soil Inventory to illustrate the potential bias and suggest a unified and unbiased calculation method for stocks of soil organic carbon, which is the largest terrestrial carbon pool.
Jan M. van Mourik, Thomas V. Wagner, J. Geert de Boer, and Boris Jansen
SOIL, 2, 299–310, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-2-299-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-2-299-2016, 2016
Ranjith P. Udawatta, Clark J. Gantzer, Stephen H. Anderson, and Shmuel Assouline
SOIL, 2, 211–220, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-2-211-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-2-211-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
Soil compaction degrades soil structure and affects water, heat, and gas exchange as well as root penetration and crop production. The objective of this study was to use X-ray computed microtomography (CMT) techniques to compare differences in geometrical soil pore parameters as influenced by compaction of two different aggregate size classes.
B. Reidy, I. Simo, P. Sills, and R. E. Creamer
SOIL, 2, 25–39, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-2-25-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-2-25-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
This study reviews pedotransfer functions from the literature for different soil and horizon types. It uses these formulae to predict bulk density (ρb) per horizon using measured data of other soil properties. These data were compared to known pb per horizon and recalibrated. These calculations were used to fill missing horizon data in the Irish soil database. This allowed the generation of a pb map to 50 cm. These pb data are at horizon level allowing more accurate estimation of C with depth.
J. J. Keizer, M. A. S. Martins, S. A. Prats, L. F. Santos, D. C. S. Vieira, R. Nogueira, and L. Bilro
SOIL, 1, 641–650, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-1-641-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-1-641-2015, 2015
Short summary
Short summary
In this study, a novel plastic optical fibre turbidity sensor was exhaustively tested with a large set of runoff samples, mainly from a recently burnt area. The different types of samples from the distinct study sites revealed without exception an increase in normalized light loss with increasing sediment concentrations that agreed (reasonably) well with a power function. Nevertheless, sensor-based predictions of sediment concentration should ideally involve site-specific calibrations.
C. Rasmussen, R. E. Gallery, and J. S. Fehmi
SOIL, 1, 631–639, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-1-631-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-1-631-2015, 2015
Short summary
Short summary
There is a need to understand the response of soil systems to predicted climate warming for modeling soil processes. Current experimental methods for soil warming include expensive and difficult to implement active and passive techniques. Here we test a simple, inexpensive in situ passive soil heating approach, based on easy to construct infrared mirrors that do not require automation or enclosures. Results indicated that the infrared mirrors yielded significant heating and drying of soils.
E. Nadal-Romero, J. Revuelto, P. Errea, and J. I. López-Moreno
SOIL, 1, 561–573, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-1-561-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-1-561-2015, 2015
Short summary
Short summary
Geomatic techniques have been routinely applied in erosion studies, providing the opportunity to build high-resolution topographic models.The aim of this study is to assess and compare the functioning of terrestrial laser scanner and close range photogrammetry techniques to evaluate erosion and deposition processes in a humid badlands area.
Our results demonstrated that north slopes experienced more intense and faster dynamics than south slopes as well as the highest erosion rates.
L. M. Thomsen, J. E. M. Baartman, R. J. Barneveld, T. Starkloff, and J. Stolte
SOIL, 1, 399–410, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-1-399-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-1-399-2015, 2015
B. A. Miller, S. Koszinski, M. Wehrhan, and M. Sommer
SOIL, 1, 217–233, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-1-217-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-1-217-2015, 2015
Short summary
Short summary
There are many different strategies for mapping SOC, among which is to model the variables needed to calculate the SOC stock indirectly or to model the SOC stock directly. The purpose of this research was to compare these two approaches for mapping SOC stocks from multiple linear regression models applied at the landscape scale via spatial association. Although the indirect approach had greater spatial variation and higher R2 values, the direct approach had a lower total estimated error.
W. Eugster and L. Merbold
SOIL, 1, 187–205, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-1-187-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-1-187-2015, 2015
Short summary
Short summary
The eddy covariance (EC) method has become increasingly popular in soil science. The basic concept of this method and its use in different types of experimental designs in the field are given, and we indicate where progress in advancing and extending the field of applications is made. The greatest strengths of EC measurements in soil science are (1) their uninterrupted continuous measurement of gas concentrations and fluxes and (2) spatial integration over
small-scale heterogeneity in the soil.
Cited articles
Aitkenhead, M., Donnelly, D., Coull, M., and Gwatkin, R.: Estimating Soil
Properties with a Mobile Phone, in: Digital Soil Morphometrics, Progress in Soil
Science Serie, edited by: Hartemink, A. E. and Minasny, B., Springer, 89–110,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28295-4_7, 2016. a
Araujo, S. R., Soderstrom, M., Eriksson, J., Isendahl, C., Stenborg, P., and
Dematte, J. A. M.: Determining soil properties in Amazonian Dark Earths by
reflectance spectroscopy, Geoderma, 237, 308–317, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2014.09.014, 2015. a, b
Australian Government: Carbon Credits (Carbon Farming Initiative) Act 2011,
https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/C2015C00012 (last access: 6 December 2017), 2011. a
Batjes, N. H.: Total carbon and nitrogen in the soils of the world, Eur. J.
Soil Sci., 47, 151–163, 1996. a
Bel'kov, M. V., Burakov, V. S., Kiris, V. V., Kononov, V. A., Raikov, S. N.,
Reshetnikov, V. N., and Tarasenkoa, N. V.: Determination of carbon in soil by
laser spectral analysis, J. Appl. Spectrosc., 75, 275–282, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10812-008-9044-3, 2008. a
Bellon-Maurel, V. and McBratney, A. B.: Near-infrared (NIR) and mid-infrared (MIR)
spectroscopic techniques for assessing the amount of carbon stock in soils – Critical
review and research perspectives, Soil Biol. Biochem., 43, 1398–1410,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2011.02.019, 2011. a, b
Bellon-Maurel, V., Fernandez-Ahumada, E., Palagos, B., Roger, J. M., and
McBratney, A.: Critical review of chemometric indicators commonly used for
assessing the quality of the prediction of soil attributes by NIR spectroscopy,
Trends Anal. Chem., 29, 1073–1081, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2010.05.006, 2010. a
Bertuzzi, P., Bruckler, L., Gabilly, Y., and Gaudu, J. C.: Calibration,
field-testing, and error analysis of a gamma-ray probe for in situ measurement
of dry bulk density, Soil Sci., 144, 425–436, 1987. a
Bispo, A., Andersen, L., Angers, D. A., Bernoux, M., Brossard, M., Cécillon,
L., Comans, R. N. J., Harmsen, J., Jonassen, K., Lamé, F., Lhuillery, C.,
Maly, S., Martin, E., Mcelnea, A. E., Sakai, H., Watabe, Y., and Eglin, T. K.:
Accounting for Carbon Stocks in Soils and Measuring GHGs Emission Fluxes from
Soils: Do We Have the Necessary Standards?, Front. Environ. Sci., 5, 41,
https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2017.00041, 2017. a
Bornemann, L., Welp, G., and Amelung, W.: Particulate organic matter at the
field scale: rapid acquisition using mid-infrared spectroscopy, Soil Sci. Soc.
Am. J., 74, 1147–1156, https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2009.0195, 2010. a
Brakensiek, D. L. and Rawls, W. J.: Soil containing rock fragments – effects
on infiltration, Catena, 23, 99–110, https://doi.org/10.1016/0341-8162(94)90056-6, 1994. a
Bricklemyer, R. S., Brown, D. J., Barefield, J. E., and Clegg, S. M.: Intact
soil core total, inorganic, and organic carbon measurement using laser-induced
breakdown spectroscopy, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 75, 1006–1018, https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2009.0244, 2011. a, b, c
Brown, D. J., Shepherd, K. D., Walsh, M. G., Mays, M. D., and Reinsch, T. G.:
Global soil characterization with VNIR diffuse reflectance spectroscopy,
Geoderma, 132, 273–290, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2005.04.025, 2006. a
Brus, D. J. and DeGruijter, J. J.: Design-based versus model-based estimates of
spatial means: Theory and application in environmental soil science, Environmetrics,
4, 123–152, https://doi.org/10.1002/env.3170040202, 1993. a
Brus, D. J. and de Gruijter, J. J.: Random sampling for geostatistical modelling?
Choosing between design-based and model-based sampling strategies for soil (with
discussion), Geoderma, 80, 1–44, 1997. a
C'assaro, F., Tominaga, T., Bacchi, O., Reichardt, K., Oliveira, J., and Timm,
L.: Improved laboratory calibration of a single-probe surface gamma-neutron
gauge, Austr. J. Soil Res., 38, 937–946, https://doi.org/10.1071/SR99107, 2000. a
Chambers, A., Lal, R., and Paustian, K.: Soil carbon sequestration potential of
US croplands and grasslands: Implementing the 4 per Thousand Initiative, J. Soil
Water Conserv., 71, 68A–74A, https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.71.3.68A, 2016. a
Chatterjee, A., Lal, R., Wielopolski, L., Martin, M. Z., and Ebinger, M. H.:
Evaluation of Different Soil Carbon Determination Methods, Crit. Rev. Plant
Sci., 28, 164–178, https://doi.org/10.1080/07352680902776556, 2009. a
Chodak, M., Niklinska, M., and Beese, F.: Near-infrared spectroscopy for analysis
of chemical and microbiological properties of forest soil organic horizons in
a heavy-metal-polluted area, Biol. Fert. Soils, 44, 171–180, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-007-0192-z, 2007. a
Christy, C.: Real-time measurement of soil attributes using on-the-go near
infrared reflectance spectroscopy, Comput. Electron. Agr., 61, 10–19, 2008. a
Clairotte, M., Grinand, C., Kouakoua, E., Thebault, A., Saby, N. P. A., Bernoux,
M., and Barthes, B. G.: National calibration of soil organic carbon concentration
using diffuse infrared reflectance spectroscopy, Geoderma, 276, 41–52,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2016.04.021, 2016. a
Cnudde, V. and Boone, M.: High-resolution X-ray computed tomography in geosciences:
A review of the current technology and applications, Earth-Sci. Rev., 123, 1–17,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2013.04.003, 2013. a, b
Cole, C. V., Duxbury, J., Freney, J., Heinemeyer, O., Minami, K., Mosier, A.,
Paustian, K., Rosenberg, N., Sampson, N., Sauerbeck, D., and Zhao, Q.: Global
estimates of potential mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions by agriculture,
Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosyst., 49, 221–228, https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1009731711346, 1997. a
Conant, R. T. and Paustian, K.: Spatial variability of soil organic carbon in
grasslands: implications for detecting change at different scales, Environ.
Pollut., 116, S127–S135, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0269-7491(01)00265-2, 2002a. a
Conant, R. T. and Paustian, K.: Spatial variability of soil organic carbon in
grasslands: implications for detecting change at different scales, Environ.
Pollut., 116, S127–S135, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0269-7491(01)00265-2, 2002b. a
Conforti, M., Matteucci, G., and Buttafuoco, G.: Monitoring soil organic carbon
content using Vis-NIR spectroscopy: A case study in southern Italy, Rendiconti
Online Societa Geologica Italiana, 42, 38–41, https://doi.org/10.3301/rol.2017.09, 2017. a
Cook, R. and Weisberg, S.: Residuals and Influence in Regression, Chapman and
Hall, New York, 1982. a
Cremers, D. A. and Radziemski, L. J.: Handbook of laser-induced breakdown
spectroscopy, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK, 2006. a
Cunningham, R. L. and Matelski, R. P.: Bulk density measurements on certain
soils high in coarse fragments, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc., 32, 109–111, 1968. a
Da Silva, R. M., Milori, D., Ferreira, E. C., Ferreira, E. J., Krug, F. J., and
Martin-Neto, L.: Total carbon measurement in whole tropical soil sample,
Spectrochim. Ac. Pt. B, 63, 1221–1224, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sab.2008.09.003, 2008. a
Don, A., Schumacher, J., Scherer-Lorenzen, M., Scholten, T., and Schulze, E.-D.:
Spatial and vertical variation of soil carbon at two grassland sites – Implications
for measuring soil carbon stocks, Geoderma, 141, 272–282, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2007.06.003, 2007. a
Fan, J. L., McConkey, B., Wang, H., and Janzen, H.: Root distribution by depth
for temperate agricultural crops, Field Crops Res., 189, 68–74, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2016.02.013, 2016. a
Fontan, J. M., Calvache, S., Lopez-Bellido, R. J., and Lopez-Bellido, L.: Soil
carbon measurement in clods and sieved samples in a Mediterranean Vertisol by
Visible and Near-Infrared Reflectance Spectroscopy, Geoderma, 156, 93–98,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2010.02.001, 2010. a
Fouinat, L., Sabatier, P., Poulenard, J., Reyss, J. L., Montet, X., and Arnaud,
F.: A new CT scan methodology to characterize a small aggregation gravel clast
contained in a soft sediment matrix, Earth Surf. Dynam., 5, 199–209,
https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-5-199-2017, 2017. a, b
Gifford, R. M. and Roderick, M. L.: Soil carbon stocks and bulk density: spatial
or cumulative mass coordinates as a basis of expression?, Global Change Biol.,
9, 1507–1514, https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2486.2003.00677.x, 2003. a
Guerrero, C., Zornoza, R., Gomez, I., and Mataix-Beneyto, J.: Spiking of NIR
regional models using samples from target sites: Effect of model size on
prediction accuracy, Geoderma, 158, 66–77, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2009.12.021, 2010. a
Guerrero, C., Stenberg, B., Wetterlind, J., Viscarra Rossel, R. A., Maestre,
F. T., Mouazen, A. M., Zornoza, R., Ruiz-Sinoga, J. D., and Kuang, B.: Assessment
of soil organic carbon at local scale with spiked NIR calibrations: effects of
selection and extra-weighting on the spiking subset, Eur. J. Soil Science, 65,
248–263, https://doi.org/10.1111/ejss.12129, 2014a. a, b
Guerrero, C., Stenberg, B., Wetterlind, J., Viscarra Rossel, R. A., Maestre, F.
T., Mouazen, A. M., Zornoza, R., Ruiz-Sinoga, J. D., and Kuang, B.: Assessment
of soil organic carbon at local scale with spiked NIR calibrations: effects of
selection and extra-weighting on the spiking subset, Eur. J. Soil Sci., 65,
248–263, https://doi.org/10.1111/ejss.12129, 2014b. a
Harmon, R. S., De Lucia, F. C., Miziolek, A. W., McNesby, K. L., Walters, R. .,
and French, P. D.: Laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) – an emerging
field-portable sensor technology for real-time, in-situ geochemical and
environmental analysis, Geochem.-Explor. Environ. Anal., 5, 21–28,
https://doi.org/10.1144/1467-7873/03-059, 2005. a
Hirmas, D. R. and Furquim, S. A. C.: Simple Modification of the Clod Method for
Determining Bulk Density of Very Gravelly Soils, Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal.,
37, 899–906, https://doi.org/10.1080/00103620600588579, 2006. a
Holmes, K. W., Wherrett, A., Keating, A., and Murphy, D. V.: Meeting bulk
density sampling requirements efficiently to estimate soil carbon stocks,
Soil Res., 49, 680–695, https://doi.org/10.1071/sr11161, 2011. a, b, c, d
Ibañez Asensio, S., Marques-Mateu, A., Moreno-Ramon, H., and Balasch, S.:
Statistical relationships between soil colour and soil attributes in semiarid
areas, Biosyst. Eng., 116, 120–129, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2013.07.013, 2013. a, b
ICAP: Emissions Trading Worldwide: Status Report 2017, Report, International
Carbon Action Partnership (ICAP), Berlin, 2017. a
IPCC: Revised 1996 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories,
Report, Meteorological Office, Bracknell, UK, 1997. a
IPCC: Climate change 2007: the physical science basis, in: Contribution of
Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel
on Climate Change, Report, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge,
UK and New York, NY, USA, 2007. a
ITPS: Status of the World's Soil Resources (SWSR) – Main Report, Report,
Intergovernmental Technical Panel on Soils (ITPS), Rome, Italy, 2015. a
Izaurralde, R. C., Rice, C. W., Wielopolski, L., Ebinger, M. H., Reeves, J. B.
I., Thomson, A. M., Harris, R., Francis, B., Mitra, S., Rappaport, A. G.,
Etchevers, J. D., Sayre, K. D., Govaerts, B., and McCarty, G. W.: Evaluation of
three field-based methods for quantifying soil carbon, Plos One, 8,
e55560, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0055560, 2013. a, b, c, d
Ji, W., Viscarra Rossel, R. A., and Shi, Z.: Accounting for the effects of water
and the environment on proximally sensed vis-NIR soil spectra and their
calibrations, Eur. J. Soil Sci., 66, 555–565, https://doi.org/10.1111/ejss.12239, 2015. a, b
Kennard, R. W. and Stone, L. A.: Computer Aided Design of Experiments, Technometrics,
11, 137–148, https://doi.org/10.2307/1266770, 1969. a
Knadel, M., Gislum, R., Hermansen, C., Peng, Y., Moldrup, P., de Jonge, L. W.,
and Greve, M. H.: Comparing predictive ability of laser-induced breakdown
spectroscopy to visible near-infrared spectroscopy for soil property determination,
Biosyst. Eng., 156, 157–172, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2017.01.007, 2017. a
Kuang, B., Mahmood, H. S., Quraishi, M. Z., Hoogmoed, W. B., Mouazen, A. M.,
and van Henten, E. J.: Sensing soil properties in the laboratory, in situ, and
on-line, Adv.n Agron., 114, 155–223, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-394275-3.00003-1, 2012. a
Lal, R.: Soil carbon sequestration to mitigate climate change, Geoderma, 123,
1–22, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2004.01.032, 2004. a
Lal, R.: Soil carbon management and climate change, Carbon Manage., 4, 439–462,
https://doi.org/10.4155/cmt.13.31, 2013. a
Lal, R.: Beyond COP21: Potential and challenges of the `4 per Thousand' initiative,
J. Soil Water Conserv., 71, 20A–25A, https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.71.1.20A, 2016a. a, b
Lal, R.: Soil health and carbon management, Food Energy Secur., 5, 212–222,
https://doi.org/10.1002/fes3.96, 2016b. a
Le Guillou, F., Wetterlind, W., Viscarra Rossel, R. A., Hicks, W., Grundy, M.,
and Tuomi, S.: How does grinding affect the mid-infrared spectra of soil and
their multivariate calibrations to texture and organic carbon?, Soil Res., 53,
913–921, https://doi.org/10.1071/sr15019, 2015. a
Lee, J., Hopmans, J. W., Rolston, D. E., Baer, S. G., and Six, J.: Determining
soil carbon stock changes: Simple bulk density corrections fail, Agr. Ecosyst.
Environ., 134, 251–256, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2009.07.006, 2009. a
Liles, G. C., Beaudette, D. E., O'Geen, A. T., and Horwath, W. R.: Developing
predictive soil C models for soils using quantitative color measurements, Soil
Sci. Soc. Am. J., 77, 2173–2181, https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2013.02.0057, 2013. a, b
Lin, L. I.-K.: A Concordance Correlation Coefficient to Evaluate Reproducibility,
Biometrics, 45, 255–268, 1989. a
Lobsey, C. R., Viscarra Rossel, R. A., Roudier, P., and Hedley, C. B.: RS-LOCAL
data-mines information from large spectral libraries to improve local calibrations,
Eur. J. Soil Sci., 68, 840–852, https://doi.org/10.1111/ejss.12490, 2017. a
Lopes, R. T., Bessa, A. P., Braz, D., and de Jesus, E. F. O.: Neutron
computerized tomography in compacted soil, Appl. Radiat. Isotop., 50, 451–458,
https://doi.org/10.1016/s0969-8043(98)00081-5, 1999. a
Lorenz, K. and Lal, R.: The depth distribution of soil organic carbon in relation
to land use and management and the potential of carbon sequestration in subsoil
horizons, Adv. Agron., 88, 35–66, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0065-2113(05)88002-2, 2005. a
Machmuller, M. B., Kramer, M. G., Cyle, T. K., Hill, N., Hancock, D., and
Thompson, A.: Emerging land use practices rapidly increase soil organic matter,
Nat. Commun., 6, 6995, https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms7995, 2015. a
Martin, P. D., Malley, D. F., Manning, G., and Fuller, L.: Determination of
soil organic carbon and nitrogen at the field level using near-infrared
spectroscopy, Canadian Journal of Soil Science, 82, 413–422,
https://doi.org/10.4141/s01-054, 2002. a
McCarty, G. W. and Reeves, J. B.: Comparison of NFAR infrared and mid infrared
diffuse reflectance spectroscopy for field-scale measurement of soil fertility
parameters, Soil Sc., 171, 94–102, https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ss.0000187377.84391.54, 2006. a, b
McConkey, B., Haugen-Kozyra, K., and Staley, D.: Prairie soil carbon balance
project summary: Soil organic carbon change on direct-seeded farmland in Saskatchewan,
in: Proceedings Soils and Crops 2013 Conference, University of Saskatchewan,
Saskatoon, SK, Canada, 2013. a
Minasny, B., McBratney, A. B., Bellon-Maurel, V., Roger, J.-M., Gobrecht, A.,
Ferrand, L., and Joalland, S.: Removing the effect of soil moisture from NIR
diffuse reflectance spectra for the prediction of soil organic carbon, Geoderma,
167–68, 118–124, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2011.09.008, 2011. a, b
Moreira, C. S., Brunet, D., Verneyre, L., Sa, S. M. O., Galdos, M. V., Cerri,
C. C., and Bernoux, M.: Near infrared spectroscopy for soil bulk density
assessment, Eur. J. Soil Sci., 60, 785–791, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.2009.01170.x, 2009. a
Muller, R. N. and Hamilton, M. E.: A simple, effective method for determining
the bulk density of stony soils, Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal., 23, 313–319,
https://doi.org/10.1080/00103629209368590, 1992. a
Naes, T., Isaksson, T., and Kowalski, B.: Locally weighted regression and scatter
correction for near-infrared reflectance data, Anal. Chem., 62, 664–673, 1990. a
Nduwamungu, C., Ziadi, N., Tremblay, G. F., and Parent, L.-E.: Near-infrared
reflectance spectroscopy prediction of soil properties: effects of sample cups
and preparation, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 73, 1896–1903, https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2008.0213, 2009. a
Ogle, S. M., Breidt, F. J., and Paustian, K.: Agricultural management impacts
on soil organic carbon storage under moist and dry climatic conditions of
temperate and tropical regions, Biogeochemistry, 72, 87–121, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-004-0360-2, 2005. a
Orr, B., Cowie, A., Castillo Sanchez, V., Chasek, P., Crossman, N., Erlewein,
A., Louwagie, G., Maron, M., Metternicht, G., Minelli, S., Tengberg, A., Walter,
S., and Welton, S.: Scientific Conceptual Framework for Land Degradation
Neutrality. A Report of the Science-Policy Interface, Report, United Nations
Convention to Combat Desertification (UNCCD), Bonn, Germany, 2017. a
Papritz, A. and Webster, R.: Estimating temporal change in soil monitoring. 1.
Statistical theory, European Journal of Soil Science, 46, 1–12,
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.1995.tb01808.x, 1995. a
Paustian, K., Lehmann, J., Ogle, S., Reay, D., Robertson, G. P., and Smith, P.:
Climate-smart soils, Nature, 532, 49–57, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature17174, 2016. a
Pedrotti, A., Pauletto, E. A., Crestana, S., Holanda, F. S. R., Cruvinel, P. E.,
and Vaz, C. M. P.: Evaluation of bulk density of Albaqualf soil under different
tillage systems using the volumetric ring and computerized tomography methods,
Soil Till. Res., 80, 115–123, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2004.03.003, 2005. a
Peng, Y., Knadel, M., Gislum, R., Deng, F., Norgaard, T., de Jonge, L. W.,
Moldrup, P., and Greve, M. H.: Predicting soil organic carbon at field scale
using a national soil spectral library, J. Near Infrared Spectrosc., 21, 213–222,
https://doi.org/10.1255/jnirs.1053, 2013. a
Peng, Y., Knadel, M., Gislum, R., Schelde, K., Thomsen, A., and Greve, M. H.:
Quantification of SOC and clay content using visible near-infrared
reflectance-mid-infrared reflectance spectroscopy with jack-knifing partial
least squares regression, Soil Sci., 179, 325–332, https://doi.org/10.1097/ss.0000000000000074, 2014. a, b
Petrovic, A. M., Siebert, J. E., and Rieke, P. E.: Soil bulk density analysis
in three dimensions by computed tomographic scanning, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J.,
46, 445–450, 1982. a
Pires, L. F., Rosa, J. A., Pereira, A. B., Arthur, R. C. J., and Bacchi, O. O.
S.: Gamma-ray attenuation method as an efficient tool to investigate soil bulk
density spatial variability, Ann. Nucl. Energy, 36, 1734–1739, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2009.08.016, 2009. a, b, c
Pires, L. F., Borges, J. A. R., Bacchi, O. O. S., and Reichardt, K.: Twenty-five
years of computed tomography in soil physics: A literature review of the
Brazilian contribution, Soil Till. Res., 110, 197–210, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2010.07.013, 2010. a
Poeplau, C. and Don, A.: Carbon sequestration in agricultural soils via
cultivation of cover crops – A meta-analysis, Agr. Ecosyst. Environ., 200,
33–41, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2014.10.024, 2015. a
Poeplau, C., Vos, C., and Don, A.: Soil organic carbon stocks are systematically
overestimated by misuse of the parameters bulk density and rock fragment content,
SOIL, 3, 61–66, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-3-61-2017, 2017. a
Ramirez-Lopez, L., Behrens, T., Schmidt, K., Stevens, A., Dematte, J. A. M.,
and Scholten, T.: The spectrum-based learner: A new local approach for modeling
soil vis-NIR spectra of complex datasets, Geoderma, 195, 268–279,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2012.12.014, 2013. a
Rawitz, E., Etkin, H., and Hazan, A.: Calibration and field testing of a two-probe
gamma gauge, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 46, 461–465, 1982. a
Rayment, G. and Lyons, D.: Soil Chemical Methods – Australasia, CSIRO Publishing,
Collingwood, Victoria, 2011. a
Reeves, J. B. I. and Smith, D. B.: The potential of mid- and near-infrared
diffuse reflectance spectroscopy for determining major- and trace-element
concentrations in soils from a geochemical survey of North America, Appl.
Geochem., 24, 1472–1481, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2009.04.017, 2009. a
Reeves, J. B.: Near- versus mid-infrared diffuse reflectance spectroscopy for
soil analysis emphasizing carbon and laboratory versus on-site analysis: Where
are we and what needs to be done?, Geoderma, 158, 3–14, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2009.04.005, 2010. a
Rodionov, A., Patzold, S., Welp, G., Pallares, R. C., Damerow, L., and Amelung,
W.: Sensing of soil organic carbon using visible and near-infrared spectroscopy
at variable moisture and surface roughness, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 78, 949–957,
https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2013.07.0264, 2014. a, b
Roudier, P., Hedley, C. B., and Ross, C. W.: Prediction of volumetric soil
organic carbon from field-moist intact soil cores, Eur. J. Soil Sci., 66,
651–660, https://doi.org/10.1111/ejss.12259, 2015. a, b
Roudier, P., Hedley, C. B., Lobsey, C. R., Viscarra Rossel, R. A., and Leroux,
C.: Evaluation of two methods to eliminate the effect of water from soil vis–NIR
spectra for predictions of organic carbon, Geoderma, 296, 98–107, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.02.014, 2017. a, b
Rousseva, S., Ahuja, L., and Heathman, G.: Use of a surface gamma neutron gauge
for in situ measurement of changes in bulk density of the tilled zone, Soil
Till. Res., 12, 235–251, 1988. a
Sankey, J. B., Brown, D., Bernard, M., and Lawrence, R.: Comparing local vs. global
visible and near-infrared (VisNIR) diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (DRS)
calibrations for the prediction of soil clay, organic C and inorganic C, Geoderma,
148, 149–158, 2008a. a
Sankey, J. B., Brown, D. J., Bernard, M. L., and Lawrence, R. L.: Comparing
local vs. global visible and near-infrared (VisNIR) diffuse reflectance
spectroscopy (DRS) calibrations for the prediction of soil clay, organic C and
inorganic C, Geoderma, 148, 149–158, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2008.09.019, 2008b. a, b
Sarkhot, D. V., Grunwald, S., Ge, Y., and Morgan, C. L. S.: Comparison and
detection of total and available soil carbon fractions using visible/near
infrared diffuse reflectance spectroscopy, Geoderma, 164, 22–32, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2011.05.006, 2011. a
Sauer, T. J. and Logsdon, S. D.: Hydraulic and physical properties of stony
soils in a small watershed, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 66, 1947–1956, 2002. a
Savitzky, A. and Golay, M. J. E.: Smoothing and Differentiation of Data by
Simplified Least Squares Procedures, Anal. Chem., 36, 1627–1639, https://doi.org/10.1021/ac60214a047, 1964. a
Segnini, A., Vaz, C., Posadas, A., Guastal, M., Lasso, P., Bernardi, A., and
Milori, D.: Chapter 12. Comparative assessment of soil bulk density by
computerized tomography methods for carbon stock quantification, Wageningen
Academic Publishers, Wageningen, the Netherlands, 2014. a
Senesi, G. S. and Senesi, N.: Laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) to
measure quantitatively soil carbon with emphasis on soil organic carbon. A
review, Analyt. Chim. Ac., 938, 7–17, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2016.07.039, 2016. a, b
Shenk, J., Westerhaus, M., and Berzaghi, P.: Investigation of a LOCAL calibration
procedure for near infrared instruments, J. Near Infrared Spectrosc., 5, 223–232, 1997. a
Sherman, D. M. and Waite, T. D.: Electronic spectra of Fe3+ oxides and
oxyhydroxides in the near infrared to ultraviolet, Am. Mineralog., 70, 1262–1269, 1985. a
Shi, T., Chen, Y., Liu, H., Wang, J., and Wu, G.: Soil organic carbon content
estimation with laboratory-based visible-near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy:
feature selection, Appl. Spectrosc., 68, 831–837, https://doi.org/10.1366/13-07294, 2014. a
Shi, Z., Ji, W., Viscarra Rossel, R., Chen, S., and Zhou, Y.: Prediction of
soil organic matter using a spatially constrained local partial least squares
regression and the Chinese vis–NIR spectral library, Eur. J. Soil Sci., 66, 679–687, 2015. a
Smith, P.: How long before a change in soil organic carbon can be detected?,
Global Change Biol., 10, 1878–1883, 2004. a
Smith, P., Martino, D., Cai, Z., Gwary, D., Janzen, H., Kumar, P., McCarl, B.,
Ogle, S., O'Mara, F., Rice, C., Scholes, B., Sirotenko, O., Howden, M.,
McAllister, T., Pan, G., Romanenkov, V., Schneider, U., Towprayoon, S.,
Wattenbach, M., and Smith, J.: Greenhouse gas mitigation in agriculture, Philos.
T. Roy. Soc. B, 363, 789–813, https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2007.2184, 2008. a
Snee, R. D.: Validation of Regression Models: Methods and Examples, Technometrics,
19, 415–428, 1977. a
Soriano-Disla, J. M., Janik, L. J., Viscarra Rossel, R. A., Macdonald, L. M.,
and McLaughlin, M. J.: The Performance of Visible, Near-, and Mid-Infrared
Reflectance Spectroscopy for Prediction of Soil Physical, Chemical, and
Biological Properties, Appl. Spectrosc. Rev., 49, 139–186, https://doi.org/10.1080/05704928.2013.811081, 2014. a
Stenberg, B., Viscarra Rossel, R. A., Mouazen, A. M., and Wetterlind, J.: Visible
and near infrared spectroscopy in soil science, Adv. Agron., 107, 163–215,
https://doi.org/10.1016/s0065-2113(10)07005-7, 2010. a, b
Stevens, A., Nocita, M., Toth, G., Montanarella, L., and van Wesemael, B.:
Prediction of Soil Organic Carbon at the European Scale by Visible and Near
InfraRed Reflectance Spectroscopy, PLoS ONE, 8, e66409, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0066409, 2013. a
Stiglitz, R., Mikhailova, E., Post, C., Schlautman, M., and Sharp, J.: Using an
inexpensive color sensor for rapid assessment of soil organic carbon, Geoderma,
286, 98–103, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2016.10.027, 2017. a
Thamo, T. and Pannell, D. J.: Challenges in developing effective policy for soil
carbon sequestration: perspectives on additionality, leakage, and permanence,
Clim. Policy, 16, 973–992, https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2015.1075372, 2016. a
Tiessen, H., Cuevas, E., and Chacon, P.: The role of soil organic matter in
sustaining soil fertility, Nature, 371, 783–785, https://doi.org/10.1038/371783a0, 1994. a
Timm, L. C., Pires, L. F., Reichardt, K., Roveratti, R., Oliveira, J. C. M.,
and Bacchia, O. O. S.: Soil bulk density evaluation by conventional and nuclear
methods, Austr. J. Soil Res., 43, 97–103, https://doi.org/10.1071/sr04054, 2005. a, b, c, d
Tranter, G., Minasny, B., McBratney, A. B., Murphy, B., McKenzie, N. J., Grundy,
M., and Brough, D.: Building and testing conceptual and empirical models for
predicting soil bulk density, Soil Use Manage., 23, 437–443, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-2743.2007.00092.x, 2007. a
Udelhoven, T., Emmerling, C., and Jarmer, T.: Quantitative analysis of soil
chemical properties with diffuse reflectance spectrometry and partial least-square
regression: A feasibility study, Plant Soil, 251, 319–329, 2003. a
UNCCD: Decision 22/COP.11, Report, United Nations Convention to Combat
Desertification (UNCCD), http://www.unccd.int/en/programmes/Science/Monitoring-Assessment/Documents/Decision22-COP11.pdf
(last access: 6 December 2017), 2013. a
United Nations: Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable
Development, Report, United Nations, https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/21252030 Agenda for Sustainable Development web.pdf
(last access: 6 December 2017), 2015. a
Vagen, T. G., Shepherd, K. D., and Walsh, M. G.: Sensing landscape level change
in soil fertility following deforestation and conversion in the highlands of
Madagascar using Vis-NIR spectroscopy, Geoderma, 133, 281–294, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2005.07.014, 2006. a
VandenBygaart, A. J. and Angers, D. A.: Towards accurate measurements of soil
organic carbon stock change in agroecosystems, Can. J. Soil Sci., 86, 465–471, 2006. a
Vasques, G., Grunwald, S., and Harris, W.: Spectroscopic models of soil organic
carbon in Florida, USA, J. Environ. Qual., 39, 923–934, 2010. a
Viscarra Rossel, R.: Robust modelling of soil diffuse reflectance spectra by
bagging-partial least squares regression, J. Near Infrared Spectrosc., 15,
39–47, https://doi.org/10.1255/jnirs.694, 2007. a
Viscarra Rossel, R. and McBratney, A. B.: Soil chemical analytical accuracy and
costs: Implications from precision agriculture, Aust. J. Exp. Agricult.,
38, 765–775, 1998. a
Viscarra Rossel, R. and Webster, R.: Predicting soil properties from the
Australian soil visible–near infrared spectroscopic database, Eur. J. Soil
Sci., 63, 848–860, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.2012.01495.x, 2012. a, b, c
Viscarra Rossel, R., Minasny, B., Roudier, P., and McBratney, A.: Colour space
models for soil science, Geoderma, 133, 320–337, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2005.07.017, 2006a. a
Viscarra Rossel, R., Walvoort, D. J. J., McBratney, A. B., Janik, L. J., and
Skjemstad, J. O.: Visible, near infrared, mid infrared or combined diffuse
reflectance spectroscopy for simultaneous assessment of various soil properties,
Geoderma, 131, 59–75, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2005.03.007, 2006b. a, b
Viscarra Rossel, R., Fouad, Y., and Walter, C.: Using a digital camera to
measure soil organic carbon and iron contents, Biosyst. Eng., 100, 149–159,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2008.02.007, 2008a. a, b
Viscarra Rossel, R., Jeon, Y., Odeh, I., and McBratney, A.: Using a legacy soil
sample to develop a mid-IR spectral library, Soil Res., 46, 1–16, https://doi.org/10.1071/SR07099, 2008b. a
Viscarra Rossel, R., Cattle, S., Ortega, A., and Fouad, Y.: In situ measurements
of soil colour, mineral composition and clay content by vis-NIR spectroscopy,
Geoderma, 150, 253–266, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2009.01.025,2009. a
Viscarra Rossel, R., Adamchuk, V. I., Sudduth, K. A., McKenzie, N. J., and
Lobsey, C.: Proximal soil sensing: An effective approach for soil measurements
in space and time, Adv. Agron., 113, 237–282, https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-386473-4.00010-5, 2011. a, b
Viscarra Rossel, R., Webster, R., Bui, E. N., and Baldock, J. A.: Baseline map
of organic carbon in Australian soil to support national carbon accounting and
monitoring under climate change, Global Change Biol., 20, 2953–2970, https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12569, 2014. a
Viscarra Rossel, R., Behrens, T., Ben-Dor, E., Brown, D. J., Dematte, J. A. M.,
Shepherd, K. D., Shi, Z., Stenberg, B., Stevens, A., Adamchuk, V., Aichi, H.,
Barthes, B. G., Bartholomeus, H. M., Bayer, A. D., Bernoux, M., Bottcher, K.,
Brodsky, L., Du, C. W., Chappell, A., Fouad, Y., Genot, V., Gomez, C., Grunwald,
S., Gubler, A., Guerrero, C., Hedley, C. B., Knadel, M., Morras, H. J. M.,
Nocita, M., Ramirez-Lopez, L., Roudier, P., Rufasto Campos, E. M., Sanborn, P.,
Sellitto, V. M., Sudduth, K. A., Rawlins, B. G., Walter, C., Winowiecki, L. A.,
Hong, S. Y., and Ji, W.: A global spectral library to characterize the world's
soil, Earth-Sci. Rev., 155, 198–230, 2016a. a, b, c, d
Viscarra Rossel, R., Brus, D. J., Lobsey, C., Shi, Z., and McLachlan, G.:
Baseline estimates of soil organic carbon by proximal sensing: Comparing
design-based, model-assisted and model-based inference, Geoderma, 265, 152–163,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2015.11.016, 2016b. a, b, c
Viscarra Rossel, R., Lobsey, C. R., Sharman, C., Flick, P., and McLachlan, G.:
Novel Proximal Sensing for Monitoring Soil Organic C Stocks and Condition,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 51, 5630–5641, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b00889, 2017. a, b, c
Vohland, M. and Emmerling, C.: Determination of total soil organic C and hot
water-extractable C from VIS-NIR soil reflectance with partial least squares
regression and spectral feature selection techniques, Eur. J. Soil Sci., 62,
598–606, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.2011.01369.x, 2011. a
Wendt, J. W. and Hauser, S.: An equivalent soil mass procedure for monitoring
soil organic carbon in multiple soil layers, Eur. J. Soil Sci., 64, 58–65,
https://doi.org/10.1111/ejss.12002, 2013. a, b
Wetterlind, J. and Stenberg, B.: Near-infrared spectroscopy for within-field
soil characterization: small local calibrations compared with national libraries
spiked with local samples, Eur. J. Soil Sci., 61, 823–843, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.2010.01283.x, 2010. a
Wetterlind, J., Piikki, K., Stenberg, B., and Söderström, M.: Exploring
the predictability of soil texture and organic matter content with a commercial
integrated soil profiling tool, Eur. J. Soil Sci., 66, 631–638, https://doi.org/10.1111/ejss.12228, 2015. a
Wielopolski, L., Hendrey, G., Johnsen, K. H., Mitra, S., Prior, S. A., Rogers,
H. H., and Torbert, H. A.: Nondestructive system for analyzing carbon in the
soil, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 72, 1269–1277, https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2007.0177, 2008. a
Wielopolski, L., Chatterjee, A., Mitra, S., and Lal, R.: In situ determination
of soil carbon pool by inelastic neutron scattering: Comparison with dry
combustion, Geoderma, 160, 394–399, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2010.10.009, 2011. a
Yang, H., Kuang, B., and Mouazen, A. M.: Quantitative analysis of soil nitrogen
and carbon at a farm scale using visible and near infrared spectroscopy coupled
with wavelength reduction, Eur. J. Soil Sci., 63, 410–420, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.2012.01443.x, 2012. a, b
Short summary
Proximal sensing can be used for soil C accounting, but the methods need to be standardized and procedural guidelines developed to ensure proficient measurement and accurate reporting. This is particularly important if there are financial incentives for landholders to adopt practices to sequester C. We review sensing for C accounting and discuss the requirements for the development of new soil C accounting methods based on sensing, including requirements for reporting, auditing and verification.
Proximal sensing can be used for soil C accounting, but the methods need to be standardized and...
